DAVID BROOKS’ THE SOCIAL ANIMAL 5
DavidBrooks’ The Social Animal
Aneffective presentation is crucial when an individual is talking infront of others. A speaker might have the relevant content thatillustrates his depth of research and an understanding of aparticular subject, but this would have no use when he fails todeliver his speech well. David Brooks gives a TED talk where hepresents social relations and how it has changed over the years.Although Brooks appears to have nervous energy at the beginning ofhis presentation, he handles it well, and he successfully deliversthe rest of his speech.
Thespeaker had evidently researched the subject carefully consideringthat he critically analyzed what social behavior is, and he gave thebackground and rational explanations to human behavior. For instance,the speaker explained what Alasdair McIntyre said about morality inthe modern world compared to the ancient times. He also usedcarefully documented supporting material, which illustrated that hehad conducted deep research on the subject. While comparing theexplanations of logic to the different stages of enlightenment,Brooks shows that philosophers such as David Hume had advancedexperience in the human capital. Considering ethos, the speaker knewwhat he was talking about since he provided real-life examples ofhuman nature. However, although the speaker appears to beknowledgeable on the subject, he does not provide conclusive evidenceon the issue that he discusses. Regarding the logos, the speaker’sevidence was adequate but not plentiful.
Theattention-getter that the speaker used captured the interest ofpeople immediately since he started by describing the social skillsof politicians that everyone could relate to, and he did thiseffectively. The provision of the speaker’s qualifications at thebeginning did not distract people from the introduction since itappeared to link the social relations of politicians to human nature.Although the introduction did not indicate the direction that thespeech would take, the speaker clearly presented the thesis at thatpoint.
Inthe body, the speaker used the topical organization to arrange thespeech, and this was the most practical choice since it provided abetter understanding of the different aspects of logic. The speakeralso clearly stated his main points, and he used transitions to makehis ideas flow. When explaining how most people raise their children,the speaker was showing how the majority of individuals lead theirlives, and he successfully connected this to an appropriateexplanation of human nature. The speaker also emphasized the mainpoints clearly, and he supported these elements using examples suchas the descriptions of the materialistic view of life.
Theconclusion of the speech also provided a summary of the presentationthrough a story about the experiences of Douglas Hofstadter and theconnection that this had on human nature. Equally important, thespeaker reviewed the major points at the end, including the manner inwhich policy failures have resulted in a shallow understanding of theconsciousness. The speaker also reemphasized the thesis as heconcluded the speech.
Thespeaker’s language was clear, and anyone who was not knowledgeableon the topic he was discussing could understand what he was saying.However, he used technical terminology in the speech including thethree insights he illustrates as part of the new humanism butadequately defines this wording. The speaker further explains eachpoint concisely including what mindsight is in relation to humannature, and he indicates that this is how people understand others bylearning what they have to offer through their minds. On the otherhand, the speaker avoided excessive verbiage by providing anexplanation to each of his points using examples of how people relateto each other.
Theresponses from the audience illustrated that they could understandwhat the speaker was discussing. However, at the point where thespeaker was explaining social relations from the moment children aregrowing up until they become old, that portion appeared to be toolong. The speaker did not use any visual aids as he was presentinghis speech, and this shows that there was no material to reinforcehis ideas.
Thespeaker did not maintain eye contact with the audience, and thisprimarily resulted from his use of notes while giving the speechsince he kept looking at them. However, when the speaker was notreferring to his notes, he talked to the audience rather than thePowerPoint considering that the speech did not include a slidepresentation. Although the speaker often used notes, he employedextemporaneous delivery in some of the sections including when hegives an example of human nature from the moment children are younguntil they become old.
Thespeaker handled nervous energy by making jokes including how MittRomney relates to people, and the audience positively responded tothis. The speaker was also good in the use of voice, and he variedhis volume depending on the point that he was putting across.Besides, he effectively used gestures to reinforce his points.
Thespeaker critically analyzed social behavior in his speech, and thisshows that he conducted deep research on the subject. However, thespeaker’s evidence was adequate but not plentiful. The speaker usedthe topical organization to arrange the speech, and this was the bestchoice considering that it provided a better understanding of thedifferent aspects of logic. Moreover, the speaker reviewed the mainpoints in the conclusion, including the manner in which policyfailures have resulted in a shallow understanding of theconsciousness. The speaker further explains each point concisely, buthe failed to maintain eye contact with the audience due to the use ofnotes.