Duty for Justice at International level

  • Uncategorized


Dutyfor Justice at International level

Equaldistribution of wealth has turned into a conspicuous subject inpolitical rationality. Philosophers have been arguing about the issueof richness and neediness, and how the disparities between nationsmay be avoided. Many philosophers have demonstrated the financialdisparity between nations endowed with resources than the poorcountries are increasing. There is a need to discuss duty of justiceat the international level, as many countries are more developed asother people in poor nations are suffering. Issue of logic hasprovoked this discourse, additionally by the substances ofglobalization and worldwide neediness, remain to be poor (Blake,2001).Sharing of natural advantages among the nations will facilitatebalanced natural resources in both rich and poor countries. The dutyjustice of sharing wealth is regarded as distributive justice.

Increasedinterest on international justice has coincided with boosted interestin the place and value of nationalism. Many philosophers in theglobal scene always looked the domestic injustices in terms of wealthdistribution and development in the past, but now the world hasreduced to a single society. Interactions between nations in variousbusiness and social activities like sports, philosophers have startedseeing the world as one nation due to free movement across nations(McMichael,2016).One of the challenging issues is the natural advantages that othercountries have over others like the European nations. Disparities inthe natural resources of nations have nurtured the need to discussthe duty of justice at the international level, which should identifythe need of sharing wealth between nations to foster improvement. Inconclusion, Due to these reasons and the need for people to actrationally in the international scene, there is an urgent need fornations to respond to the need to share the wealth across nationssuch that all people in society to own something.


Blake,M. (2001). Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy.Philosophy&amp public affairs,&nbsp30(3),257-296.

McMichael,P. (2016).&nbspDevelopmentand social change: A global perspective.Sage Publications.

Close Menu