First Name, LastName
Name of Unit
The artist uses both textual and pictorial presentations to constructan informative image. Consequently, the visual object is a product ofcreativity and improvization. An analysis of the image shows theartist’s intention to warn drivers about the dangers of using theirphones while driving.
The image depicts a man grimacing from the impact of a fist to thechin. Two vehicles are drawn on the hand and on the person`s cheek.In particular, a truck is depicted on the man while a saloon car isdrawn on the arm. Notably, the two vehicles are portrayed as if on acollision course. The expression on the man’s face reveals theextent of pain while the release of steamy saliva shows the impact ofthe blow. The image also contains the words “STOP THE VIOLENCEDON’T TEXT AND DRIVE.” The pointed words reveal the artist’sintention to warn drivers against using their phones while driving.
The artist constructed the image to communicate to drivers. Many roadaccidents are caused by the careless use of mobile phones whiledriving. In this regard, people pay less attention to oncomingtraffic and other road signs. Collisions result in body injuries andfatalities, in extreme cases. Straying off the road could also leadto devastating consequences. Therefore, the artist uses the image toshow the terrible effects of texting while driving.
Furthermore, the artist assumes that the viewer has the ability anddesire to control his behavior. Granted, some road accidents occurdue to unforeseeable circumstances. Such conditions are precipitatedby intoxication, mechanical problems, and inclement weather. However,all drivers have the power to regulate their use of cell phones.Notably, some urgent communication could require an immediateresponse. In such instances, drivers may decide to pull over to theroadside before reading and replying to the message. The use of theword “stop” shows the artist’s faith in the ability of viewersto avoid texting while driving.
The image uses symbolism to highlight the dangers of using cellphones while driving. The fist connects with the man’s chin at thepoint where the car makes contact with the truck. In this respect,the artist compares violence to texting while driving. Using commonoccurrences as symbols helps viewers to reason. Hence, the audiencecan make a quick connection between the debilitating effects ofviolence and the undesirable consequences of texting while driving.Notably, collisions between two vehicles almost always lead tocasualties. Consequently, the artist uses symbolism to show theadverse effects of using cell phones while driving.
Besides, an analysis of the image reveals that the artist appeals tothe logic and emotion of drivers. For example, the depiction of thetwo vehicles shows the high potential for collisions whenever peoplewander into opposite lanes. The use of a truck and a small carincites the emotions of the audience. In this regard, viewers arehelped to imagine the consequences of such high-speed collisions. Inmany cases, the deafening impact leads to certain death. Therefore,the artist appeals to the logic and emotions of the audience toemphasize the effects of using cell phones while driving.
Indeed, the image warns drivers about the terrible consequences oftexting while driving. The artist compares the impact of a punch tothe face to a collision between two vehicles. The words used are alsoeffective in capturing the viewer’s attention. In addition, theartist uses symbolism in a manner that appeals to the logic andemotions of the audience. Consequently, all drivers would do theirutmost to avoid texting while driving.