Picasso painting analysis “The Studio”

  • Uncategorized

Picassopainting analysis “The Studio&quot


Thepaper shall analyze two paintings by Pablo Picasso (1881-1973). Bothof them are referred to as “The studio.” The first painting wasmade between 1927 and 1928 and measures 59&quot x 7` 7&quot. It isan oil on canvas painting.&quot The second piece was made by Picassoin 1955 (Picasso n.p b). The painting is an oil paint on canvas piecethat measures about 809 mm by 649 mm. It’s drawn from the generalcollection known as Tate and was once presented by Elly KahnweillerGustav in the year 1974. The painting shows a representation of afamous studio that he used to work in. It is known as, ‘LaCalifornie.’ One aspect that may be identified in the painting isthe artistic nature that was put into the development of the piece.The artist was quite apt at developing it and applied a direct painton the piece of canvass. He achieved this through the use of threedifferent elements. One of them was a brush while another one was apalette knife. There are various artifacts that are represented inthe painting found inside the studio. This was, perhaps, to show thekind of seriousness that the painter put into his job in such a waythat he was able to replicate his talent into his daily life (Picasson.pa). One can visibly see some of the tools that the painters usedin their different works on the painting as well as a guitar that iswell displayed on the wall. There is also a large window that appearsin the room, providing a pristine view to the outside that contains agreen scenery which is quite appealing to the audience. It is,therefore, very true that the artist was very observant and bore theability to vividly bring out his work environment through the use ofhis skills (Picasso n.p a). The piece is, therefore, naturalistic,given the raw nature of the items shown and the kind of message thatthe painter aimed to achieve as he developed the piece. The trees arewell shown and the kind of architecture that is applied in developingthe building that houses the studio. The kind of style that he showsin his work is expressionism where he does a lot to illustrate theappearance of the studio (Picasso n.p b). For, instance, one caneasily identify some of the furniture that are found in the room,such as chairs, and this increases the ability of an individual toremember such, easily, in future. He also applies the theme of theartist in the piece, given the different items that can be linked toan artist as shown in the painting. One of them is a guitar thatappears on it.Figure1.0 first painting (The studio by Pablo Picasso, 1927-1928)

Figure2.0 Second painting (The studio by Pablo Picasso, 1955)


Thefirst painting has a yellow color that clearly stands out while inthe second painting, the colors white and black are quite dominant.They help to show the ancient nature of the building that housed thestudio (Picasso n.p a). In the first painting, the striking nature ofthe colors is quite important because they increase the ability of anindividual to remember the piece quite clearly and, therefore, helpthem achieve the message that the painter aimed to send across in thelong run. The first painting also appears to be more spaciouscompared to the first one, and it is much easier for an individual toidentify some of the elements depicted in it (Picasso n.p b). Thetexture used in the second painting is much rougher as Picasso put inthe attempt to explicitly display the different aspects that werecontained in the painting such as the different ornaments that werecontained in the studio. Thirdparagraph

Theissue of balance also comes into perspective while looking into thepaintings made by Picasso. The second painting achieves a great dealof balance in the long run given the fact that the colors white andblack are the most outstanding and interact well to bring out a piecethat is magnificent and quite beautiful to look at. The firstpainting has colors that are varying, and as a result, it isdifficult for one to state that some level of balance was achievedwhile coming up with the piece of art. The rhythm in the second piecethat represents a studio is also mild. It offers the one looking atit an ample time to concentrate on it and try to ascertain the kindof message that the painter aimed to communicate while coming up withthe piece (Picasso n.p a). In the first one, the rhythm is loud, andthe different shapes and colors that are shown bring in some elementof chaos, in the long run, an aspect that makes it quite hard for oneto follow through the thought pattern of the painter and the kind ofinformation that he aimed to put across. While both of the paintingsseem to be quite proportional, the second one appears to be moreproportional as all the elements that need to appear in the paintingare well shown and demonstrated. It appears that the painter wasquite good at representing all the elements required in the painting.


Picasso,Pablo. The studio. 1927-1928 (a)

Picasso,Pablo. The studio. 1955 (b)

Close Menu